I am sorry for the long absence from cross-posting my IT-Lex posts. Although I have still been writing them, I was writing them while I was on vacation in Texas. So, I just didn't have the time to cross post them once they were published.
In any event, here is one of my more recent ones that I really enjoyed researching. It involves a case out of New York that concluded a news organization could be liable for a privacy lawsuit when it posted a picture of an aspiring lawyer (incorrectly) claiming that she was the younger sister of Kimora Lee Simmons.
The aspiring lawyer sued the news organization and another news organization that had debunked the story for violating her right to privacy under New York law. The court concluded that the incorrect story was so "riddled with fiction" that it didn't qualify for a newsworthiness exception. But, the news organization that got the story right did qualify for the exception. So what is the moral of the story? If you post a picture of a person online, you better make sure that the accompanying story of that person is factually accurate, especially if you use the person's name.
These types of online defamation and privacy claims are quickly becoming my favorite type of lawsuits to research. And luckily for me, these lawsuits continue to rise with the rise of social media.
Have you ever received a robocall on your cell phone? Personally, I get them (and robo-text messages) all the time from my bank, various stores, and the radio. I always assumed it was an annoying fact of life, but as it turns out the Telephone Consumer Protection Act allows me to opt-out of receiving them.
A recent Third Circuit decision allows you to opt-out of these calls, even after expressly consenting to them. To see my full break down of what happened, check out the post I wrote for IT-Lex.
Full disclosure: I know a little bit about cyberbullying. But in this day and age, I have to wonder who hasn't been cyberbullied? Let's face it. Kids can be mean, and the Internet certainly makes it easier. Cyberbulling is a serious problem, and one that people need to address. But it appears that passing laws against cyberbullying isn't a good way to do it.
I've written a couple of articles now about recently passed cyberbullying laws that broadly punish behavior out of context and don't actually provide any protection for the people the laws were meant to protect. Cyberbullying laws have even been used to punish students for talking bad about their teachers (not the people who are meant to be protected from these types of laws) online. And here is my most recent post about a cyberbullying law out of Nova Scotia, which scholars believe is truly awful.
As social media use becomes more prevalent, more and more people seem to be using it incorrectly. What's the correct way to use social media? Well, for starters, don't use it to post your illegal activities online.
For a round-up of people posting stupid things and getting in trouble, check out my post here.
A recent court decision out of Germany may have effectively killed modern file-hosting websites. It requires the file-hosting site, RapidShare, to "police the internet." The court will require RapidShare to make sure that other sites are not providing links to copyrighted material available on RapidShare.
It seems that this decision could have massive implications for file-sharing sites, as RapidShare will not be the only site affected by this new rule. To see my full write-up of the decision, click here.
My presence on Twitter isn't very active, but I have a presence, and I love my right to free speech on it. There is always unprotect speech, like defamation, obscenity, etc. But free speech is an important part of social networking. Of course, not all countries have the same free speech rights that are granted to Americans through the U.S. Constitution.
For example, a woman working for the Australian Government was recently fired after she criticized the government on an anonymous Twitter account. The judge even made a point that Australian citizens do not have an “unfettered implied right (or freedom) of political expression." To see my full write up on the story, click here.
About this Blog
I was once a licensed attorney (in Washington), but my license is now inactive. I like to geek out about entertainment,
internet, and privacy law. This blog is a place for me to do that. All of the views expressed are my own and should not be considered legal advice.
My personal blog is located under the tab Pax's Page.
Rachel is a typer of words.